Prominent IP Updates on Dec 22, 2014

Authors : Rishabh Manocha, Akanksha Anand

Netflix wins Open TV patent suit

The District Court of the Hague in the Netherlands has rejected a patent suit from Kudelski’s Open TV. In the suit, which was launched in October 2013, Open TV alleged that Netflix “infringes its patents and is seeking, among other relief, to enjoin Netflix from further infringement by its recently launched service in the Netherlands.”

Read More

Microsoft to pay Virnetx USD 23 mln to settle patent dispute

Virnetx announced that it signed an amended settlement and license agreement with Microsoft. This changes the terms of their original settlement in 2010 and puts an end to their patent infringement suits. Microsoft has agreed to pay USD 23 million to Virnetx to settle the patent dispute and expand Microsoft’s license.

Read More

Renewable Energy Group and Neste Oil Settle US and Singapore Patent Lawsuits

Renewable Energy Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:REGI), headquartered in Ames, Iowa, USA and Neste Oil Corporation of Finland have entered into a Settlement and License Agreement whereby the parties have settled Neste’s US patent infringement lawsuit against REG and REG’s Singapore patent infringement lawsuit against Neste and REG has licensed certain Neste Oil NEXBTL technology and intellectual property rights for use at REG Geismar.

Uber set to patent surge pricing; its 24 patent apps rejected for being `obvious’ variations

Uber applied for a US patent last year for “dynamically adjusting prices for service” using mobile devices. The system measures supply (Uber drivers) and demand (passengers hailing rides with smartphones), and prices fares accordingly . It’s one of at least 13 US patent applications filed by Uber or its founders to give it an edge over potential rivals ahead of a potential initial public offering. Ten applications were initially rejected by the US Patent and Trademark Office for “obviousness” or for covering something not eligible for protection.

Prominent IP Updates on Dec 22, 2014

Authors : Rishabh Manocha, Akanksha Anand

Netflix wins Open TV patent suit

The District Court of the Hague in the Netherlands has rejected a patent suit from Kudelski’s Open TV. In the suit, which was launched in October 2013, Open TV alleged that Netflix “infringes its patents and is seeking, among other relief, to enjoin Netflix from further infringement by its recently launched service in the Netherlands.”

Read More

Microsoft to pay Virnetx USD 23 mln to settle patent dispute

Virnetx announced that it signed an amended settlement and license agreement with Microsoft. This changes the terms of their original settlement in 2010 and puts an end to their patent infringement suits. Microsoft has agreed to pay USD 23 million to Virnetx to settle the patent dispute and expand Microsoft’s license.

Read More

Renewable Energy Group and Neste Oil Settle US and Singapore Patent Lawsuits

Renewable Energy Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:REGI), headquartered in Ames, Iowa, USA and Neste Oil Corporation of Finland have entered into a Settlement and License Agreement whereby the parties have settled Neste’s US patent infringement lawsuit against REG and REG’s Singapore patent infringement lawsuit against Neste and REG has licensed certain Neste Oil NEXBTL technology and intellectual property rights for use at REG Geismar.

Uber set to patent surge pricing; its 24 patent apps rejected for being `obvious’ variations

Uber applied for a US patent last year for “dynamically adjusting prices for service” using mobile devices. The system measures supply (Uber drivers) and demand (passengers hailing rides with smartphones), and prices fares accordingly . It’s one of at least 13 US patent applications filed by Uber or its founders to give it an edge over potential rivals ahead of a potential initial public offering. Ten applications were initially rejected by the US Patent and Trademark Office for “obviousness” or for covering something not eligible for protection.

Prominent IP Updates on Dec 22, 2014

Authors : Rishabh Manocha, Akanksha Anand

Netflix wins Open TV patent suit

The District Court of the Hague in the Netherlands has rejected a patent suit from Kudelski’s Open TV. In the suit, which was launched in October 2013, Open TV alleged that Netflix “infringes its patents and is seeking, among other relief, to enjoin Netflix from further infringement by its recently launched service in the Netherlands.”

Read More

Microsoft to pay Virnetx USD 23 mln to settle patent dispute

Virnetx announced that it signed an amended settlement and license agreement with Microsoft. This changes the terms of their original settlement in 2010 and puts an end to their patent infringement suits. Microsoft has agreed to pay USD 23 million to Virnetx to settle the patent dispute and expand Microsoft’s license.

Read More

Renewable Energy Group and Neste Oil Settle US and Singapore Patent Lawsuits

Renewable Energy Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:REGI), headquartered in Ames, Iowa, USA and Neste Oil Corporation of Finland have entered into a Settlement and License Agreement whereby the parties have settled Neste’s US patent infringement lawsuit against REG and REG’s Singapore patent infringement lawsuit against Neste and REG has licensed certain Neste Oil NEXBTL technology and intellectual property rights for use at REG Geismar.

Uber set to patent surge pricing; its 24 patent apps rejected for being `obvious’ variations

Uber applied for a US patent last year for “dynamically adjusting prices for service” using mobile devices. The system measures supply (Uber drivers) and demand (passengers hailing rides with smartphones), and prices fares accordingly . It’s one of at least 13 US patent applications filed by Uber or its founders to give it an edge over potential rivals ahead of a potential initial public offering. Ten applications were initially rejected by the US Patent and Trademark Office for “obviousness” or for covering something not eligible for protection.

DISCLAIMER

The Bar Council of India does not permit the solicitation of work and advertising by legal practitioners and advocates.
This website has been designed only for the purposes of dissemination of basic information on KAnalysis; information that is otherwise available on the internet, various public platforms and social media. Careful attention has been given to ensure that the information provided herein is accurate and up-to-date. However, KAnalysis is not responsible for any reliance that a reader places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused due to any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information, or its interpretation thereof. The reader is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources.
This website is not an attempt to advertise or solicit clients and does not seek to create or invite any lawyer-client relationship. The links provided on this website are to facilitate access to basic information on KAnalysis, and, to share the various thought leadership initiatives undertaken by it. The content herein or on such links should not be construed as a legal reference or legal advice. Readers are advised not to act on any information contained herein or on the links and should refer to legal counsels and experts in their respective jurisdictions for further information and to determine its impact.
KAnalysis advises against the use of the communication platform provided on this website for the exchange of any confidential, business or politically sensitive information. User is requested to use his or her judgment and exchange of any such information shall be solely at the user’s risk.
KAnalysis uses cookies on its website to improve its usability. This helps us in providing a good user experience and also helps in improving our website. By continuing to use our website without changing your privacy settings, you agree to use our cookies.
Terms of use and Privacy policy