Monthly News Roundup | Global | December 2023
Taiwan's Swift Design Patent Process: A Race to Innovation
In a bid to boost innovation and streamline the design patent examination process, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) has launched the Accelerated Design Patent Examination Pilot Program. This initiative aims to offer a more adaptable approach to evaluating design patent applications, presenting several key conditions for applicants. Notably, applicants must substantiate commercial use by a third party, supported by a detailed timeline and third party information. Those with recognized design awards, both domestically and internationally, from esteemed platforms such as the Golden Pin Design Award, iF Design Award, Red Dot Design Award, Good Design Award, and the
International Design Excellence Award, are eligible. A distinctive feature of this program is its inclusivity toward startup companies established for less than 8 years, extending the opportunity to fast-track three design patent applications annually. Non-Taiwanese companies, however, must furnish proof of their establishment date along with a Chinese translation. In contrast, India’s design patent examination process lacks such an expedited pathway, relying on a standard timeline.
USPTO Unveils 'Pre-Prosecution Pilot' to Empower Inventors: A Gateway to Enhanced Innovation
In a move to bolster innovation and support under resourced inventors, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has introduced the Pre-Prosecution Pilot program. Tailored to assist first-time inventors, the initiative offers a unique opportunity to assess the strengths and weaknesses of potential patent applications. USPTO examiners will provide search assistance, aiding inventors in determining the novelty of their creations within the existing art Although the assessment won’t serve as an official patentability ruling, it aims to guide applicants in avoiding common pitfalls that could impede the patent review process.
Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, emphasized the commitment to fostering innovation across all segments of the economy. The program’s inaugural training, a virtual two-day workshop on February 27 and 28, 2024, is limited to 20 qualifying individuals. It encompasses information sessions, practice opportunities, and personalized feedback sessions with USPTO patent examiners. As the USPTO welcomes candidates until January 31, 2024, this pioneering initiative signals a positive stride toward a more inclusive innovation ecosystem. While the USPTO’s Pre-Prosecution Pilot brings a unique focus on first-time inventors, India’s multifaceted approach seeks to create a conducive environment for innovation across various sectors. The global impact is evident as nations strive to empower inventors and streamline patent processes for a more inclusive and dynamic future.
India and US ink Pact to Boost Innovation Ecosystems; Cabinet Gives Nod to Collaboration with Italy on IP Rights
The Union Cabinet, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, greenlit a pivotal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between India and the US. Aimed at bolstering innovation ecosystems, the agreement emphasizes deep tech sectors and the Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET) initiative. An official statement highlighted the MoU’s potential to amplify commercial prospects in the high-tech domain.
The Union Cabinet, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, greenlit a pivotal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between India and the US. Aimed at bolstering innovation ecosystems, the agreement emphasizes deep tech sectors and the Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET) initiative. An official statement highlighted the MoU’s potential to amplify commercial prospects in the high-tech domain.
Legal Battle Unleashed: New York Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement
The New York Times has initiated legal proceedings against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging the unauthorized utilization of millions of its articles to train AI chatbots, leading to copyright violations. In a landmark lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court, the newspaper claims to be the first major U.S. media entity to take legal action against OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, and Microsoft, a key investor and creator of the Copilot AI platform. The complaint asserts that both entities leveraged the Times’ substantial investment in journalism to create alternative information delivery methods, constituting a form of “free-riding.”
The Times argues that the defendants’ actions are not “transformative” but rather an attempt to substitute its content, impacting its audience and business. OpenAI and Microsoft contend that their use of copyrighted material for training AI products falls under “fair use,” a legal doctrine. The Times, not specifying damages but estimating them in the “billions of dollars,” also demands the destruction of chatbot models and training sets that integrate its content. This legal clash underscores the evolving debate surrounding the application of copyright laws in the realm of AI development and content training.
Beijing Internet Court Breaks Ground: Grants Copyright to AI-Generated Content in Landmark Ruling
In a groundbreaking ruling, the Beijing Internet Court has created legal history by recognizing copyright protection for artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) in mainland China. The case, initiated by a plaintiff named Li, involved an image generated through StabilityAI’s text-to-image software. The central issue was whether an AI-generated creation could be considered an original work eligible for copyright protection. The plaintiff alleged infringement when a blogger used the AI-generated image without permission on Baidu-owned Baijiahao.
The court held that the AI-generated image constituted an artwork, falling within the ambit of copyright protection, owing to the “originality” and intellectual input of the human creator who made decisions in the AI creation process. The ruling emphasized that the plaintiff’s intellectual investment, including prompt selection, parameter setting, and design choices, reflected aesthetic judgment and personalized decision-making. Consequently, the court ordered the defendant to issue a public apology, pay 500 yuan in damages, and cover 50 yuan in court fees. This landmark decision, the first of its kind in China, sets a precedent for future AI copyright disputes and underscores the evolving legal landscape at the intersection of AI technology and intellectual property rights.
UK Supreme Court Rejects AI as Inventor: Landmark Ruling on Patent Eligibility
In a significant ruling, the UK Supreme Court has rejected the notion that an AI machine, DABUS, can be granted patents for autonomously created inventions. The case, brought by Stephen Thaler, sought patent approval for two AI generated inventions. The Court emphasized that existing law does not contemplate non-human inventors, addressing questions about patentability and the definition of “inventor” at a policy level. Thaler argued that as the creator and operator of DABUS, he was entitled to patent rights for its inventions. However, the Court held that under the Patents Act 1977, an inventor must be a “natural person,” and DABUS, being a machine, doesn’t meet this criterion. The ruling
implies a need for legal changes before AI machines can secure patents in the UK.
China's Red Tape Revolution: Embracing the Apostille Convention for Streamlined Legal Processes
In a transformative move, China officially joined the Apostille Convention on March 8, 2023, revolutionizing document authentication. The Convention, effective in China from November 7, 2023, streamlines processes for foreign litigants, sparing them the intricacies of notarization, validation by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and consulate legalization. Public documents, including administrative papers and notarial acts, are now exempt from these cumbersome steps. Even for private documents like Powers of Attorney for Chinese legal representation, a simple notarization suffices. This progressive change reduces bureaucratic hurdles, making legal procedures in China more accessible and efficient for international entities. As China’s embassies cease legalization services, India could glean insights from this approach, potentially adopting the Apostille Convention to enhance the efficiency of its own global legal engagements and foster a more seamless international legal landscape.
China Revamps Patent Rules: Embracing Digital Age and Enhancing Efficiency
On November 3, 2023, China’s State Council greenlit the “Regulations for the Implementation of the Patent Law (Draft),” marking a pivotal shift in the nation’s patent framework. Stemming from the 2020 amendments to the Patent Law, these revised rules hold crucial implications for the industry. One notable enhancement involves the intricate details of design patents, providing clarity on open licenses and compensation systems, particularly in the realm of drug patents.
A standout feature of this revision is the expanded definition of a patent application’s “written form,” now encompassing both electronic and traditional paper formats. This progressive step not only accommodates technological advancements but also streamlines the patent application process, contributing to heightened efficiency. The regulations also aim to fortify the patent evaluation and invalidation systems. The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has articulated its commitment to refining ancillary regulations, including the “Patent Examination Guidelines.” This comprehensive overhaul reflects China’s commitment to fostering innovation, adapting to the digital age, and ensuring a robust and efficient patent system that aligns with global standards.
JPO Reports Surge in AI-Related Invention Filings, Signals Maturing Landscape
Since 2019, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) has been annually documenting the landscape of AI-related inventions in Japan, and its most recent update, extending to 2021, reveals a continued surge in filings. The realm of AI-related inventions spans core AI innovations (FI code: G06N) and applications where artificial intelligence intersects with diverse technical domains. The JPO’s comprehensive study underscores the remarkable growth in AI-related invention filings since the onset of the AI boom in 2014. Over this period, filings catapulted from just over 1000 to a staggering 9000 per year. The data for 2021 alone highlights nearly 2700 filings for new core AI-related inventions, a stark contrast to the modest 220 filings recorded in 2014. However, while the momentum persists, there are indications of a gradual deceleration in the pace of growth in recent years.
This surge aligns with the country’s ambitions in emerging technologies. As India positions itself on the global tech map, these findings emphasize the need for strategic investments and initiatives to harness the potential of AI. Collaboration with global innovators and a robust domestic AI ecosystem could propel India into a prominent role in the unfolding AI revolution.
India Monthly News Roundup – September 2024
NEWSLETTER GLOBAL –AUGUST
India Monthly News Roundup – June & July, 2024
Monthly Roundup | Japan-USA-India | KAFOCUS
Monthly News Roundup | Global | December 2023
Taiwan's Swift Design Patent Process: A Race to Innovation
In a bid to boost innovation and streamline the design patent examination process, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) has launched the Accelerated Design Patent Examination Pilot Program. This initiative aims to offer a more adaptable approach to evaluating design patent applications, presenting several key conditions for applicants. Notably, applicants must substantiate commercial use by a third party, supported by a detailed timeline and third party information. Those with recognized design awards, both domestically and internationally, from esteemed platforms such as the Golden Pin Design Award, iF Design Award, Red Dot Design Award, Good Design Award, and the
International Design Excellence Award, are eligible. A distinctive feature of this program is its inclusivity toward startup companies established for less than 8 years, extending the opportunity to fast-track three design patent applications annually. Non-Taiwanese companies, however, must furnish proof of their establishment date along with a Chinese translation. In contrast, India’s design patent examination process lacks such an expedited pathway, relying on a standard timeline.
USPTO Unveils 'Pre-Prosecution Pilot' to Empower Inventors: A Gateway to Enhanced Innovation
In a move to bolster innovation and support under resourced inventors, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has introduced the Pre-Prosecution Pilot program. Tailored to assist first-time inventors, the initiative offers a unique opportunity to assess the strengths and weaknesses of potential patent applications. USPTO examiners will provide search assistance, aiding inventors in determining the novelty of their creations within the existing art Although the assessment won’t serve as an official patentability ruling, it aims to guide applicants in avoiding common pitfalls that could impede the patent review process.
Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, emphasized the commitment to fostering innovation across all segments of the economy. The program’s inaugural training, a virtual two-day workshop on February 27 and 28, 2024, is limited to 20 qualifying individuals. It encompasses information sessions, practice opportunities, and personalized feedback sessions with USPTO patent examiners. As the USPTO welcomes candidates until January 31, 2024, this pioneering initiative signals a positive stride toward a more inclusive innovation ecosystem. While the USPTO’s Pre-Prosecution Pilot brings a unique focus on first-time inventors, India’s multifaceted approach seeks to create a conducive environment for innovation across various sectors. The global impact is evident as nations strive to empower inventors and streamline patent processes for a more inclusive and dynamic future.
India and US ink Pact to Boost Innovation Ecosystems; Cabinet Gives Nod to Collaboration with Italy on IP Rights
The Union Cabinet, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, greenlit a pivotal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between India and the US. Aimed at bolstering innovation ecosystems, the agreement emphasizes deep tech sectors and the Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET) initiative. An official statement highlighted the MoU’s potential to amplify commercial prospects in the high-tech domain.
The Union Cabinet, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, greenlit a pivotal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between India and the US. Aimed at bolstering innovation ecosystems, the agreement emphasizes deep tech sectors and the Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET) initiative. An official statement highlighted the MoU’s potential to amplify commercial prospects in the high-tech domain.
Legal Battle Unleashed: New York Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement
The New York Times has initiated legal proceedings against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging the unauthorized utilization of millions of its articles to train AI chatbots, leading to copyright violations. In a landmark lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court, the newspaper claims to be the first major U.S. media entity to take legal action against OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, and Microsoft, a key investor and creator of the Copilot AI platform. The complaint asserts that both entities leveraged the Times’ substantial investment in journalism to create alternative information delivery methods, constituting a form of “free-riding.”
The Times argues that the defendants’ actions are not “transformative” but rather an attempt to substitute its content, impacting its audience and business. OpenAI and Microsoft contend that their use of copyrighted material for training AI products falls under “fair use,” a legal doctrine. The Times, not specifying damages but estimating them in the “billions of dollars,” also demands the destruction of chatbot models and training sets that integrate its content. This legal clash underscores the evolving debate surrounding the application of copyright laws in the realm of AI development and content training.
Beijing Internet Court Breaks Ground: Grants Copyright to AI-Generated Content in Landmark Ruling
In a groundbreaking ruling, the Beijing Internet Court has created legal history by recognizing copyright protection for artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) in mainland China. The case, initiated by a plaintiff named Li, involved an image generated through StabilityAI’s text-to-image software. The central issue was whether an AI-generated creation could be considered an original work eligible for copyright protection. The plaintiff alleged infringement when a blogger used the AI-generated image without permission on Baidu-owned Baijiahao.
The court held that the AI-generated image constituted an artwork, falling within the ambit of copyright protection, owing to the “originality” and intellectual input of the human creator who made decisions in the AI creation process. The ruling emphasized that the plaintiff’s intellectual investment, including prompt selection, parameter setting, and design choices, reflected aesthetic judgment and personalized decision-making. Consequently, the court ordered the defendant to issue a public apology, pay 500 yuan in damages, and cover 50 yuan in court fees. This landmark decision, the first of its kind in China, sets a precedent for future AI copyright disputes and underscores the evolving legal landscape at the intersection of AI technology and intellectual property rights.
UK Supreme Court Rejects AI as Inventor: Landmark Ruling on Patent Eligibility
In a significant ruling, the UK Supreme Court has rejected the notion that an AI machine, DABUS, can be granted patents for autonomously created inventions. The case, brought by Stephen Thaler, sought patent approval for two AI generated inventions. The Court emphasized that existing law does not contemplate non-human inventors, addressing questions about patentability and the definition of “inventor” at a policy level. Thaler argued that as the creator and operator of DABUS, he was entitled to patent rights for its inventions. However, the Court held that under the Patents Act 1977, an inventor must be a “natural person,” and DABUS, being a machine, doesn’t meet this criterion. The ruling
implies a need for legal changes before AI machines can secure patents in the UK.
China's Red Tape Revolution: Embracing the Apostille Convention for Streamlined Legal Processes
In a transformative move, China officially joined the Apostille Convention on March 8, 2023, revolutionizing document authentication. The Convention, effective in China from November 7, 2023, streamlines processes for foreign litigants, sparing them the intricacies of notarization, validation by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and consulate legalization. Public documents, including administrative papers and notarial acts, are now exempt from these cumbersome steps. Even for private documents like Powers of Attorney for Chinese legal representation, a simple notarization suffices. This progressive change reduces bureaucratic hurdles, making legal procedures in China more accessible and efficient for international entities. As China’s embassies cease legalization services, India could glean insights from this approach, potentially adopting the Apostille Convention to enhance the efficiency of its own global legal engagements and foster a more seamless international legal landscape.
China Revamps Patent Rules: Embracing Digital Age and Enhancing Efficiency
On November 3, 2023, China’s State Council greenlit the “Regulations for the Implementation of the Patent Law (Draft),” marking a pivotal shift in the nation’s patent framework. Stemming from the 2020 amendments to the Patent Law, these revised rules hold crucial implications for the industry. One notable enhancement involves the intricate details of design patents, providing clarity on open licenses and compensation systems, particularly in the realm of drug patents.
A standout feature of this revision is the expanded definition of a patent application’s “written form,” now encompassing both electronic and traditional paper formats. This progressive step not only accommodates technological advancements but also streamlines the patent application process, contributing to heightened efficiency. The regulations also aim to fortify the patent evaluation and invalidation systems. The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has articulated its commitment to refining ancillary regulations, including the “Patent Examination Guidelines.” This comprehensive overhaul reflects China’s commitment to fostering innovation, adapting to the digital age, and ensuring a robust and efficient patent system that aligns with global standards.
JPO Reports Surge in AI-Related Invention Filings, Signals Maturing Landscape
Since 2019, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) has been annually documenting the landscape of AI-related inventions in Japan, and its most recent update, extending to 2021, reveals a continued surge in filings. The realm of AI-related inventions spans core AI innovations (FI code: G06N) and applications where artificial intelligence intersects with diverse technical domains. The JPO’s comprehensive study underscores the remarkable growth in AI-related invention filings since the onset of the AI boom in 2014. Over this period, filings catapulted from just over 1000 to a staggering 9000 per year. The data for 2021 alone highlights nearly 2700 filings for new core AI-related inventions, a stark contrast to the modest 220 filings recorded in 2014. However, while the momentum persists, there are indications of a gradual deceleration in the pace of growth in recent years.
This surge aligns with the country’s ambitions in emerging technologies. As India positions itself on the global tech map, these findings emphasize the need for strategic investments and initiatives to harness the potential of AI. Collaboration with global innovators and a robust domestic AI ecosystem could propel India into a prominent role in the unfolding AI revolution.
India Monthly News Roundup – September 2024
NEWSLETTER GLOBAL –AUGUST
India Monthly News Roundup – June & July, 2024
Monthly Roundup | Japan-USA-India | KAFOCUS
Monthly News Roundup | Global | December 2023
Taiwan's Swift Design Patent Process: A Race to Innovation
In a bid to boost innovation and streamline the design patent examination process, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) has launched the Accelerated Design Patent Examination Pilot Program. This initiative aims to offer a more adaptable approach to evaluating design patent applications, presenting several key conditions for applicants. Notably, applicants must substantiate commercial use by a third party, supported by a detailed timeline and third party information. Those with recognized design awards, both domestically and internationally, from esteemed platforms such as the Golden Pin Design Award, iF Design Award, Red Dot Design Award, Good Design Award, and the
International Design Excellence Award, are eligible. A distinctive feature of this program is its inclusivity toward startup companies established for less than 8 years, extending the opportunity to fast-track three design patent applications annually. Non-Taiwanese companies, however, must furnish proof of their establishment date along with a Chinese translation. In contrast, India’s design patent examination process lacks such an expedited pathway, relying on a standard timeline.
USPTO Unveils 'Pre-Prosecution Pilot' to Empower Inventors: A Gateway to Enhanced Innovation
In a move to bolster innovation and support under resourced inventors, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has introduced the Pre-Prosecution Pilot program. Tailored to assist first-time inventors, the initiative offers a unique opportunity to assess the strengths and weaknesses of potential patent applications. USPTO examiners will provide search assistance, aiding inventors in determining the novelty of their creations within the existing art Although the assessment won’t serve as an official patentability ruling, it aims to guide applicants in avoiding common pitfalls that could impede the patent review process.
Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, emphasized the commitment to fostering innovation across all segments of the economy. The program’s inaugural training, a virtual two-day workshop on February 27 and 28, 2024, is limited to 20 qualifying individuals. It encompasses information sessions, practice opportunities, and personalized feedback sessions with USPTO patent examiners. As the USPTO welcomes candidates until January 31, 2024, this pioneering initiative signals a positive stride toward a more inclusive innovation ecosystem. While the USPTO’s Pre-Prosecution Pilot brings a unique focus on first-time inventors, India’s multifaceted approach seeks to create a conducive environment for innovation across various sectors. The global impact is evident as nations strive to empower inventors and streamline patent processes for a more inclusive and dynamic future.
India and US ink Pact to Boost Innovation Ecosystems; Cabinet Gives Nod to Collaboration with Italy on IP Rights
The Union Cabinet, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, greenlit a pivotal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between India and the US. Aimed at bolstering innovation ecosystems, the agreement emphasizes deep tech sectors and the Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET) initiative. An official statement highlighted the MoU’s potential to amplify commercial prospects in the high-tech domain.
The Union Cabinet, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, greenlit a pivotal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between India and the US. Aimed at bolstering innovation ecosystems, the agreement emphasizes deep tech sectors and the Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET) initiative. An official statement highlighted the MoU’s potential to amplify commercial prospects in the high-tech domain.
Legal Battle Unleashed: New York Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over Copyright Infringement
The New York Times has initiated legal proceedings against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging the unauthorized utilization of millions of its articles to train AI chatbots, leading to copyright violations. In a landmark lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court, the newspaper claims to be the first major U.S. media entity to take legal action against OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, and Microsoft, a key investor and creator of the Copilot AI platform. The complaint asserts that both entities leveraged the Times’ substantial investment in journalism to create alternative information delivery methods, constituting a form of “free-riding.”
The Times argues that the defendants’ actions are not “transformative” but rather an attempt to substitute its content, impacting its audience and business. OpenAI and Microsoft contend that their use of copyrighted material for training AI products falls under “fair use,” a legal doctrine. The Times, not specifying damages but estimating them in the “billions of dollars,” also demands the destruction of chatbot models and training sets that integrate its content. This legal clash underscores the evolving debate surrounding the application of copyright laws in the realm of AI development and content training.
Beijing Internet Court Breaks Ground: Grants Copyright to AI-Generated Content in Landmark Ruling
In a groundbreaking ruling, the Beijing Internet Court has created legal history by recognizing copyright protection for artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) in mainland China. The case, initiated by a plaintiff named Li, involved an image generated through StabilityAI’s text-to-image software. The central issue was whether an AI-generated creation could be considered an original work eligible for copyright protection. The plaintiff alleged infringement when a blogger used the AI-generated image without permission on Baidu-owned Baijiahao.
The court held that the AI-generated image constituted an artwork, falling within the ambit of copyright protection, owing to the “originality” and intellectual input of the human creator who made decisions in the AI creation process. The ruling emphasized that the plaintiff’s intellectual investment, including prompt selection, parameter setting, and design choices, reflected aesthetic judgment and personalized decision-making. Consequently, the court ordered the defendant to issue a public apology, pay 500 yuan in damages, and cover 50 yuan in court fees. This landmark decision, the first of its kind in China, sets a precedent for future AI copyright disputes and underscores the evolving legal landscape at the intersection of AI technology and intellectual property rights.
UK Supreme Court Rejects AI as Inventor: Landmark Ruling on Patent Eligibility
In a significant ruling, the UK Supreme Court has rejected the notion that an AI machine, DABUS, can be granted patents for autonomously created inventions. The case, brought by Stephen Thaler, sought patent approval for two AI generated inventions. The Court emphasized that existing law does not contemplate non-human inventors, addressing questions about patentability and the definition of “inventor” at a policy level. Thaler argued that as the creator and operator of DABUS, he was entitled to patent rights for its inventions. However, the Court held that under the Patents Act 1977, an inventor must be a “natural person,” and DABUS, being a machine, doesn’t meet this criterion. The ruling
implies a need for legal changes before AI machines can secure patents in the UK.
China's Red Tape Revolution: Embracing the Apostille Convention for Streamlined Legal Processes
In a transformative move, China officially joined the Apostille Convention on March 8, 2023, revolutionizing document authentication. The Convention, effective in China from November 7, 2023, streamlines processes for foreign litigants, sparing them the intricacies of notarization, validation by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and consulate legalization. Public documents, including administrative papers and notarial acts, are now exempt from these cumbersome steps. Even for private documents like Powers of Attorney for Chinese legal representation, a simple notarization suffices. This progressive change reduces bureaucratic hurdles, making legal procedures in China more accessible and efficient for international entities. As China’s embassies cease legalization services, India could glean insights from this approach, potentially adopting the Apostille Convention to enhance the efficiency of its own global legal engagements and foster a more seamless international legal landscape.
China Revamps Patent Rules: Embracing Digital Age and Enhancing Efficiency
On November 3, 2023, China’s State Council greenlit the “Regulations for the Implementation of the Patent Law (Draft),” marking a pivotal shift in the nation’s patent framework. Stemming from the 2020 amendments to the Patent Law, these revised rules hold crucial implications for the industry. One notable enhancement involves the intricate details of design patents, providing clarity on open licenses and compensation systems, particularly in the realm of drug patents.
A standout feature of this revision is the expanded definition of a patent application’s “written form,” now encompassing both electronic and traditional paper formats. This progressive step not only accommodates technological advancements but also streamlines the patent application process, contributing to heightened efficiency. The regulations also aim to fortify the patent evaluation and invalidation systems. The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has articulated its commitment to refining ancillary regulations, including the “Patent Examination Guidelines.” This comprehensive overhaul reflects China’s commitment to fostering innovation, adapting to the digital age, and ensuring a robust and efficient patent system that aligns with global standards.
JPO Reports Surge in AI-Related Invention Filings, Signals Maturing Landscape
Since 2019, the Japan Patent Office (JPO) has been annually documenting the landscape of AI-related inventions in Japan, and its most recent update, extending to 2021, reveals a continued surge in filings. The realm of AI-related inventions spans core AI innovations (FI code: G06N) and applications where artificial intelligence intersects with diverse technical domains. The JPO’s comprehensive study underscores the remarkable growth in AI-related invention filings since the onset of the AI boom in 2014. Over this period, filings catapulted from just over 1000 to a staggering 9000 per year. The data for 2021 alone highlights nearly 2700 filings for new core AI-related inventions, a stark contrast to the modest 220 filings recorded in 2014. However, while the momentum persists, there are indications of a gradual deceleration in the pace of growth in recent years.
This surge aligns with the country’s ambitions in emerging technologies. As India positions itself on the global tech map, these findings emphasize the need for strategic investments and initiatives to harness the potential of AI. Collaboration with global innovators and a robust domestic AI ecosystem could propel India into a prominent role in the unfolding AI revolution.
India Monthly News Roundup – September 2024
NEWSLETTER GLOBAL –AUGUST
India Monthly News Roundup – June & July, 2024
Monthly Roundup | Japan-USA-India | KAFOCUS
Connect with our Experts to resolve your legal issues!
KAnalysis is a boutique full service law firm, well positioned to represent its international and domestic clients.
© 2007 – 2024 KAnalysis Consultant Private Limited. All Rights Reserved